Skip to main content
By DQKC
By DQKC

The artwork Don Quixote’s Metamorphosis Februay 11 1955 was examined using microscopy with direct and transmitted light on both the front and back sides.

The microscopic characteristics of the ink and background shows variations in the edges of the image,the variations of the thickness of the ink in the areas of the background, the ink absorbing into the medium at different amounts based on thickness.

Chemical testing was not conclusive to the type of ink used to create the artwork, however the limited chemical extraction that was observed is consistent with an India type ink.

The background did not contain any evidence that was useful to determine the first date of production.

Conclusion of Speckin Based on the testing conducted and the results of those tests it is Speckins that the artwork submitted for examination was created by hand and is not a massed produced printing process. Further no evidence was noticed to indicate that the piece was created at any time other than the purported date.

Speckin proves that not only is the work not a reproduction but the ink is indeed an India ink. That the work has bleeding and that the date is February 11 1955 which contradicts anyone that states the work is a reproduction of any work inclusive of the August 10 drawing and any of its subsequent engraved copies or posters.

Channeling Picasso collection image
Contract Address0x2953...4963
Token ID
Token StandardERC-1155
ChainPolygon
MetadataCentralized
Creator Earnings
10%

World renowed forensics expert Erik Speckin testimony on ink of Don Quixote Feb 11th 1955

visibility
12 views
  • Price
    USD Price
    Quantity
    Expiration
    From
  • Price
    USD Price
    Quantity
    Floor Difference
    Expiration
    From
keyboard_arrow_down
Event
Price
From
To
Date

World renowed forensics expert Erik Speckin testimony on ink of Don Quixote Feb 11th 1955

visibility
12 views
  • Price
    USD Price
    Quantity
    Expiration
    From
  • Price
    USD Price
    Quantity
    Floor Difference
    Expiration
    From
By DQKC
By DQKC

The artwork Don Quixote’s Metamorphosis Februay 11 1955 was examined using microscopy with direct and transmitted light on both the front and back sides.

The microscopic characteristics of the ink and background shows variations in the edges of the image,the variations of the thickness of the ink in the areas of the background, the ink absorbing into the medium at different amounts based on thickness.

Chemical testing was not conclusive to the type of ink used to create the artwork, however the limited chemical extraction that was observed is consistent with an India type ink.

The background did not contain any evidence that was useful to determine the first date of production.

Conclusion of Speckin Based on the testing conducted and the results of those tests it is Speckins that the artwork submitted for examination was created by hand and is not a massed produced printing process. Further no evidence was noticed to indicate that the piece was created at any time other than the purported date.

Speckin proves that not only is the work not a reproduction but the ink is indeed an India ink. That the work has bleeding and that the date is February 11 1955 which contradicts anyone that states the work is a reproduction of any work inclusive of the August 10 drawing and any of its subsequent engraved copies or posters.

Channeling Picasso collection image
Contract Address0x2953...4963
Token ID
Token StandardERC-1155
ChainPolygon
MetadataCentralized
Creator Earnings
10%
keyboard_arrow_down
Event
Price
From
To
Date