The concept of rarity is rooted in ideological pretexts of immaterialism: the closer a collectible reaches toward absolute zero, to absence of being, it becomes more rare. The ideological erasure from 1 to almost 0 manifests the materialization of the immaterial original. Here, as with Rauschenberg’s erasure of de Kooning, what isn’t left over, the very presence of profound absence (the missing ape / punk) establishes a “next” hierarchy of rarity by extending being to include non being.
The signified Erasure of Bored Ape #1037 (Maui Prime) was enabled by the owner / signifier of Bored Ape Yacht Club #1037 (@beijingdou) whose permission granted said Erasure.
The meta-narrative which began with Rauschenberg’s radical assertion that erasure of one value system can establish a counter-positive value system is an early example of the concept of visual derivatives to an extreme. The erasure of the newly iconic Bored Ape & Crypto Punk extends this meta-narrative further by directly confronting the globally controversial dialog around the question: How can an immaterial art form such as NFT hold value.
Apes & Punks and the like gained their precedent of valuation from the history of collectibles: a valuation system which depends on presence of rarity. The concept of rarity is itself rooted in ideological pretexts of immaterialism: the closer a collectible is to zero made / to absence of being / is becoming then more rare by its ideological erasure from many to none. Where a Bored Ape falls on this spectrum of presences defines its value in said system.
Erased Bored Ape #1037 (Maui Prime)
- PriceUSD PriceQuantityExpirationFrom
- PriceUSD PriceQuantityFloor DifferenceExpirationFrom
Erased Bored Ape #1037 (Maui Prime)
- PriceUSD PriceQuantityExpirationFrom
- PriceUSD PriceQuantityFloor DifferenceExpirationFrom
The concept of rarity is rooted in ideological pretexts of immaterialism: the closer a collectible reaches toward absolute zero, to absence of being, it becomes more rare. The ideological erasure from 1 to almost 0 manifests the materialization of the immaterial original. Here, as with Rauschenberg’s erasure of de Kooning, what isn’t left over, the very presence of profound absence (the missing ape / punk) establishes a “next” hierarchy of rarity by extending being to include non being.
The signified Erasure of Bored Ape #1037 (Maui Prime) was enabled by the owner / signifier of Bored Ape Yacht Club #1037 (@beijingdou) whose permission granted said Erasure.
The meta-narrative which began with Rauschenberg’s radical assertion that erasure of one value system can establish a counter-positive value system is an early example of the concept of visual derivatives to an extreme. The erasure of the newly iconic Bored Ape & Crypto Punk extends this meta-narrative further by directly confronting the globally controversial dialog around the question: How can an immaterial art form such as NFT hold value.
Apes & Punks and the like gained their precedent of valuation from the history of collectibles: a valuation system which depends on presence of rarity. The concept of rarity is itself rooted in ideological pretexts of immaterialism: the closer a collectible is to zero made / to absence of being / is becoming then more rare by its ideological erasure from many to none. Where a Bored Ape falls on this spectrum of presences defines its value in said system.