Skip to main content
 DQKC
 DQKC

The artwork Don Quixote’s Metamorphosis Februay 11 1955 was examined using microscopy with direct and transmitted light on both the front and back sides.

The microscopic characteristics of the ink and background shows variations in the edges of the image,the variations of the thickness of the ink in the areas of the background, the ink absorbing into the medium at different amounts based on thickness.

Chemical testing was not conclusive to the type of ink used to create the artwork, however the limited chemical extraction that was observed is consistent with an India type ink.

The background did not contain any evidence that was useful to determine the first date of production.

Conclusion of Speckin Based on the testing conducted and the results of those tests it is Speckins that the artwork submitted for examination was created by hand and is not a massed produced printing process. Further no evidence was noticed to indicate that the piece was created at any time other than the purported date.

Speckin proves that not only is the work not a reproduction but the ink is indeed an India ink. That the work has bleeding and that the date is February 11 1955 which contradicts anyone that states the work is a reproduction of any work inclusive of the August 10 drawing and any of its subsequent engraved copies or posters.

Channeling Picasso collection image
合約地址0x2953...4963
代幣 ID
代幣標準ERC-1155
區塊鏈Polygon
中繼資料集中式
創作者收益
10%

World renowed forensics expert Erik Speckin testimony on ink of Don Quixote Feb 11th 1955

visibility
12 檢視次數
  • 價格
    美元價格
    數量
    到期日
  • 價格
    美元價格
    數量
    底價差額
    到期日
keyboard_arrow_down
活動
價格
日期

World renowed forensics expert Erik Speckin testimony on ink of Don Quixote Feb 11th 1955

visibility
12 檢視次數
  • 價格
    美元價格
    數量
    到期日
  • 價格
    美元價格
    數量
    底價差額
    到期日
 DQKC
 DQKC

The artwork Don Quixote’s Metamorphosis Februay 11 1955 was examined using microscopy with direct and transmitted light on both the front and back sides.

The microscopic characteristics of the ink and background shows variations in the edges of the image,the variations of the thickness of the ink in the areas of the background, the ink absorbing into the medium at different amounts based on thickness.

Chemical testing was not conclusive to the type of ink used to create the artwork, however the limited chemical extraction that was observed is consistent with an India type ink.

The background did not contain any evidence that was useful to determine the first date of production.

Conclusion of Speckin Based on the testing conducted and the results of those tests it is Speckins that the artwork submitted for examination was created by hand and is not a massed produced printing process. Further no evidence was noticed to indicate that the piece was created at any time other than the purported date.

Speckin proves that not only is the work not a reproduction but the ink is indeed an India ink. That the work has bleeding and that the date is February 11 1955 which contradicts anyone that states the work is a reproduction of any work inclusive of the August 10 drawing and any of its subsequent engraved copies or posters.

Channeling Picasso collection image
合約地址0x2953...4963
代幣 ID
代幣標準ERC-1155
區塊鏈Polygon
中繼資料集中式
創作者收益
10%
keyboard_arrow_down
活動
價格
日期