Skip to main content

0

“Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race.” Nick Bostrom

In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom proposed a trilemma that he called "the simulation argument".

"The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage (that is, one capable of running high-fidelity ancestor simulations) is very close to zero", or "The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running simulations of their evolutionary history, or variations thereof, is very close to zero", or "The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one."

Backed by file

ARTISANT.io web3 fashion platform // marketplace collection.
Contract Address0x46dc...1410
Token ID70
Token StandardERC-721
BlockchainEthereum
Creator Fees5%

Will we live in Simulation?

visibility
2 views
keyboard_arrow_down
  • Price
    USD Price
    Expiration
    From
  • Price
    USD Price
    Floor Difference
    Expiration
    From
Event
Price
From
To
Date

Will we live in Simulation?

0

visibility
2 views
  • Price
    USD Price
    Expiration
    From
  • Price
    USD Price
    Floor Difference
    Expiration
    From

“Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super-powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine-grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race.” Nick Bostrom

In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom proposed a trilemma that he called "the simulation argument".

"The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage (that is, one capable of running high-fidelity ancestor simulations) is very close to zero", or "The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running simulations of their evolutionary history, or variations thereof, is very close to zero", or "The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one."

Backed by file

ARTISANT.io web3 fashion platform // marketplace collection.
Contract Address0x46dc...1410
Token ID70
Token StandardERC-721
BlockchainEthereum
Creator Fees5%
Event
Price
From
To
Date